Re: 70-200/2.8 L IS USM Mark II vs. Mark III. It looks like the optical construction remains the same, but with updated coatings, so the resolution should be pretty much unchanged, while the contrast most likely will be slightly improved. Mode 3 IS will improve the usagebility for shooting sport. Canon 16-35 F2.8 L II; Priced similar as option 1, I get a single-lens solution, but this lens has got some critical review since III version came, but third version is LOT expensive too. I am confused if this is good or better than Option 1, then I can simply get this lens for both astro and landscape usage. Option 3. Canon 16-35 F2.8 L III That's right. I dropped my Canon EOS 5D Mark III with an EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens attached into the Caribbean Sea. Fortunately, it was in an Ewa-Marine U-B 100 Underwater Housing. As I have mentioned, my landscape photography plans did not work out as well as planned on my recent St John, USVI photo trip, but I had a backup plan. De Canon EF 16-35mm f/4.0L IS USM is een betaalbare groothoekzoom van uitzonderlijke kwaliteit. “In combinatie met deze lens is fotograferen echt een feest.”. En: “De lens is knetterscherp en geeft vrijwel geen vertekening.”. Alle belangrijke reviews! Groothoek-zoomobjectief: spectaculaire panorama’s. Maio/2015 – A Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM foi a primeira objetiva que eu não recomendei no vlog do zack. Vamos esclarecer uma coisa: não, eu não tenho nada contra este modelo; sim, eu fiz ótimas fotos com ele. Porém eu não consigo superar a performance nas bordas no full frame mesmo em f/8, pelo preço de US$1599. nqqpSE.